The Financial Mail and the amaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism on Tuesday filed papers in the Pretoria high court seeking access to the tax returns of former president Jacob Zuma and challenging the constitutionality of tax secrecy provisions.<\/p>\n
The papers are the culmination of a process that began in February when FM applied to Sars under the Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) for Zuma\u2019s returns in the years 2010 to 2018, when he was head of state.<\/p>\n
The request and a subsequent appeal were denied by Sars on grounds including secrecy provisions in PAIA and the Tax Administration Act (TAA). PAIA specifically excludes tax information from its public interest considerations, while the TAA prohibits Sars and its employees from disclosing any taxpayer information to any member of the public.<\/p>\n
The TAA\u00a0further prevents any party, including the media, who come into possession of such information from reporting on it.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe believe the existing legislation to be unconstitutional, as it prevents us from obtaining information on the tax status of senior members of the executive \u2013 like former president Jacob Zuma \u2013 accused of serious crimes, including being tax delinquent. It restricts our ability to disseminate this vital information to the public,\u201d says FM editor Rob Rose.<\/p>\n
The former president\u2019s tax affairs have been the subject of intense scrutiny. Serious allegations of non-compliance were revealed in investigative journalist Jacques Pauw\u2019s bestselling book,\u00a0T<\/em>he President\u2019s Keepers<\/em>, including that Zuma had not filed tax returns for several years while president.<\/p>\n Former public protector Thuli Madonsela also weighed in on the subject in her 2014 report\u00a0Secure in Comfort<\/em>,\u00a0which stated that Zuma was liable for the fringe benefits accruing to him as a result of the dubious \u201csecurity upgrades\u201d made to his Nkandla homestead.<\/p>\n \u201cThe tax status of presidents and other holders of high office is of manifest public interest.\u00a0The public may rightly ask, if the president does not pay his taxes or fails to disclose all income, why should they?\u00a0The political capture and governance failures at Sars were to a\u00a0large degree facilitated by the lack of public transparency at this important institution,\u201d says Karabo Rajuili, advocacy coordinator at amaBhungane.<\/p>\n \u201cA vital part of rebuilding the integrity of Sars and improving tax morality\u00a0is ensuring that investigative journalists and whistle-blowers have the right to access information and report on it, including how the tax authority handles the affairs of senior government officials,\u201d she says.<\/p>\n The applicants are not seeking blanket access to the tax records of the general public. \u201cThat is a critical distinction to make,\u201d says Dario Milo, a partner at Webber Wentzel attorneys who is representing the media.<\/p>\n \u201cThe modification we are seeking to the law will allow an information officer in certain, specific cases, and under the prescripts of PAIA, to grant permission to the public, including the media, to access the tax records of senior government officials accused of wrongdoing, and in turn, will give journalists the freedom to report on it,\u201d Milo said.<\/p>\n The application names as respondents Sars, Zuma, the ministers of finance and justice, and the information regulator.<\/p>\n