{"id":25769,"date":"2023-02-17T20:53:21","date_gmt":"2023-02-17T18:53:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/amabhungane.org\/?p=25769"},"modified":"2025-01-28T12:16:21","modified_gmt":"2025-01-28T12:16:21","slug":"230218-red-flags-in-police-hunt-for-former-moti-group-employee","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/further.co.za\/amabwp\/230218-red-flags-in-police-hunt-for-former-moti-group-employee\/","title":{"rendered":"The Moti Files: Red flags in police hunt for former Moti Group employee"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As controversial businessman Zunaid Moti\u2019s sprawling multi-billion rand conglomerate scrambles to contain a leak of sensitive company information, questions have been raised about the role of the South African Police Service (SAPS) and prominent forensic investigator Paul O\u2019Sullivan.<\/p>\n<p>Twenty-eight-year-old Clinton van Niekerk, who was employed within the Moti Group as a legal assistant, has already faced his former employer\u2019s wrath for allegedly having left the company with thousands of downloaded files.<\/p>\n<p>He was arrested on 25 January at King Shaka International Airport for \u201ctheft of information\u201d as he was about to leave the country.<\/p>\n<p>That set off frenzied efforts by Frederick \u201cFrikkie\u201d Lutzkie, who took van Niekerk under his wing, to try and prevent van Niekerk being removed from Durban to Johannesburg, where the warrant for his arrest was issued, and to secure his release.<\/p>\n<p>Lutzkie, an ex-cage fighter turned coal baron, is a former business partner who fell out with Moti and is now engaged in a bitter dispute with companies in the Moti Group.<\/p>\n<p>Van Niekerk is said to have turned to Lutzkie for help and protection, knowing that Lutzkie and Moti were embroiled in ongoing litgation.<\/p>\n<p>Lawyers acting on van Niekerk\u2019s behalf claim that he is a bone fide whistle-blower and is being targeted by Moti in an attempt to muzzle him. They also claim that SAPS members have been weaponised in support of the Moti Group, and have abused their power and intimidated van Niekerk.<\/p>\n<p>Moti claims van Niekerk stole confidential company information and took it to his rival.<\/p>\n<p>Whatever the motive, the leak threatens to expose sensitive information relating to Moti\u2019s murky business empire, which includes business interests in mining, property development, security, logistics and aviation.<\/p>\n<p>Moti has significant interests in Zimbabwe, where he is perceived as being close to senior figures in Zimbabwe\u2019s ruling elite.<\/p>\n<p>Lutzkie, a key witness in an extraordinary ex parte application to challenge van Niekerk\u2019s arrest and removal to Gauteng, told the judge hearing the case that the information from within the Moti organisation includes evidence of \u201cserious economic crimes\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Lutzkie told the judge, \u201cWe sit with evidence that Mr Moti and his whole team last year have committed serious economic crimes by selling [fictitious mineral reserves] in Zimbabwe to Australian and Chinese people\u2026 and that evidence is also with the police now.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Lutkzie claims that the information also points to Moti\u2019s dealings with Zimbabwe\u2019s president, Emmerson Mnangagwa. He told the court that they \u2013 presumably he and van Niekerk \u2013 did not approach SAPS because of Moti\u2019s connections to the police.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, they cooperated with Australian and British authorities, who helped arrange a visa for van Niekerk. Van Niekerk, says Lutzkie, was on his way to London, via Ireland, when he was arrested.<\/p>\n<p>Moti has denied these allegations and derided Lutzkie\u2019s version as unsupported by evidence.<\/p>\n<p>Through a public relations agency he told amaBhungane, \u201cWith regards to the \u201cfictitious\u201d mineral reserves sold to Chinese investors, this is completely baseless. An agreement does exist between a Zimbabwean registered Moti Group and a Chinese company in regard to a lithium asset.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis agreement was preceded by extensive due diligence investigations conducted by the Chinese investors. It is worth noting that the Chinese investor is a multi-national with extensive interests in Zimbabwe.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe agreement between the Zimbabwean company and the Chinese company is confidential, and we therefore chose not to provide a copy, although you probably received the stolen document from Mr Van Niekerk.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Moti\u2019s representatives claim that van Niekerk illegally downloaded more than 4000 files and then resigned and took the information to Moti\u2019s biggest foe. They say they launched an internal investigation and then laid criminal charges in November last year when Lutzkie included information they believed was leaked in court filings.<\/p>\n<p>However the circumstances of van Niekerk\u2019s arrest and his treatment call into question the conduct of SAPS members from Sandton Police Station, where Moti is alleged by Lutzkie to wield influence.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Sibitane <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The role of one Colonel Cain Sibitane from Sandton SAPS has caused particular concern as it was recently <a href=\"https:\/\/www.timeslive.co.za\/sunday-times-daily\/news\/2022-11-17-infamous-international-diamond-dealer-gunned-down-in-hush-hush-sa-hit\/\">revealed<\/a> in the <em>Sunday Times<\/em> that Sibitane was travelling in a car with diamond dealer Sylla Moussa when Moussa was wounded \u2013 and later died \u2013 in an apparent hit on 20 August last year.<\/p>\n<p>Moussa was involved in a long term dispute with Moti about the alleged theft of a priceless pink diamond.<\/p>\n<p>Sibitane, according to Lutzkie, played a key role in the investigation and arrest of van Niekerk.<\/p>\n<p>Neither SAPS nor Sibitane responded to detailed questions, nor did they acknowledge follow-up questions sent to them by amaBhungane.<\/p>\n<p>However Lutskie\u2019s latest court filings and a letter from van Niekerk\u2019s lawyer to police and prosecutors seen by amaBhungane suggest that van Niekerk is now in witness protection and is cooperating with the Hawks in relation to allegations concerning the Moti organisation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>O\u2019Sullivan<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Evidence in amaBhungane\u2019s possession also raises questions about the role in van Niekerk\u2019s arrest played by prominent forensic investigator Paul O\u2019Sullivan, who is working the case for Moti.<\/p>\n<p>Moti was once the corruption buster\u2019s publicly declared target but is now O&#8217;Sullivan&#8217;s client and occasional business partner.<\/p>\n<p>Documents alleged to emanate from inside the Moti organisation may cast light on how and why O\u2019Sullivan flipped to Moti\u2019s side and the work he has performed for Moti.<\/p>\n<p>O\u2019Sullivan maintains that his relationship with Moti is above board and he has been open about it.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI run a forensic practice and have, from time to time, carried out forensic work for some of the companies connected to Moti, on an as needed basis. I have not tried to conceal the fact that I have provided professional services for companies connected to Moti,\u201d he told amaBhungane.<\/p>\n<p>He accused van Niekerk of having \u201cstolen\u201d the documents and of acting on behalf of Lutkzie to drive a \u201cfalse\u201d narrative.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Police misconduct?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Lutzkie told the Durban High Court that van Niekerk was pulled aside at the airport when on the way to the UK to provide evidence in connection with criminal allegations involving Moti, though Moti has called this claim into question.<\/p>\n<p>In an urgent application without notice to the police or prosecution service following his detention at King Shaka, van Niekerk\u2019s lawyers obtained an order from the court preventing police from moving van Niekerk to Randburg, Johannesburg, where the warrant of arrest for \u201ctheft of information\u201d was issued.<\/p>\n<p>Van Niekerk\u2019s counsel told acting judge Warren Shapiro, that the young lawyer was distraught and said, \u201cThey are going to kill me. They are going to kill me.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The court heard from one of Lutzkie\u2019s employees and a witness in the matter that police officers drove van Niekerk around Durban and took him to a shooting range in an alleged attempt to intimidate him.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the judge\u2019s order, police from Sandton SAPS who travelled to Kwa Zulu Natal following the arrest, took van Niekerk out of the province to Gauteng, where he appeared in the Randburg Magistrate\u2019s Court on 27 January.<\/p>\n<p>On that day the police failed to respond to the provisional order issued by Shapiro the day before and the judge then made his order final.<\/p>\n<p>As a result the Randburg magistrate set the arrest warrant aside, the case was struck from the roll, and van Niekerk was immediately released.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Counter application<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Moti Group has not given up though.<\/p>\n<p>In an urgent application lodged on 13 February in the Durban High Court, David Willoughby of Mazzetti Management Services \u2013 one of approximately 250 companies in the Moti Group \u2013 seeks to have the order securing van Niekerk\u2019s release set aside.<\/p>\n<p>Willoughby argues that the hearing presided over by Judge Shapiro was riddled with irregularities and should be set aside.<\/p>\n<p>Willoughby claims that van Niekerk broke the confidentiality provisions in his employment contract and \u201cinter alia, the Protection of Personal Information Act, the Cyber Crimes Act, and the Criminal Procedure Act\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Willoughby maintains that van Niekerk is a flight risk and that social media posts suggested that van Niekerk planned to relocate to New Zealand with his wife.<\/p>\n<p>The proceedings that led to the warrant for van Niekerk\u2019s arrest, Willoughby argues, amounted to \u201ca fundamental and serious error of law, an undermining of the rule of law and a blatant disregard for the rights of parties who have grounds to obtain a warrant of arrest against persons suspected of having committed crimes.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>He objects to what he says was \u201cirrelevant controversial, speculative, and false defamatory testimony\u201d that was allowed to go untested, including claims that there was a \u201cgood chance\u201d van Niekerk would be shot and killed by the police.<\/p>\n<p>Responding in turn to Willoughby\u2019s application, Lutzkie says it is misguided and that the Moti Group, through Willoughby, is trying to take action on behalf of the police and prosecutorial authorities \u201cwithout any authority to do so\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>According to the affidavit, van Niekerk is now in witness protection.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Post-arrest meeting<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Willoughby\u2019s court papers also reveal that legal representatives of the Moti Group met with Petrus Skhosana, the senior public prosecutor at the Randburg Magistrate\u2019s Court.<\/p>\n<p>Also present at the meeting was O\u2019Sullivan and his assistant, and two police officers from Sandton SAPS \u2013 Colonel Sibitane and Warrant Officer Prince Rabali, who amaBhungane understands was one of the policemen who brought van Niekerk from KZN to Johannesburg.<\/p>\n<p>Sibitane is second in command to the Sandton station commander, Brigadier Egen Moodley.<\/p>\n<p>Neither he nor Moodley replied to queries about Sibitane\u2019s involvement with Moussa, the diamond dealer, nor about the alleged sway the Moti organisation exercises in Sandton police circles.<\/p>\n<p>Moussa was allegedly travelling near Carletonville when the attack happened.<\/p>\n<p>Alongside him in the car was Sibitane, who was \u201coff duty\u201d at the time.<\/p>\n<p>Sibitane was allegedly injured in the attack and returned fire with his service pistol as the attackers fled. He told TimesLive that he was \u201ctaken to Fountains hospital to be stabilised, while Moussa was first taken to Carletonville hospital then airlifted Lenmed hospital, where he died.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Moussa and Moti were embroiled in a fight over an infamous pink diamond said to be worth $50-million, which Moussa accused Moti of stealing. A case brought by Moussa in Switzerland against the storage company that held the diamond was ongoing at the time of his death.<\/p>\n<p>Moti Group representatives have dismissed insinuations by Lutzkie that Moti was connected to Moussa\u2019s death as &#8220;ridiculous&#8221;, saying that Moti was only a witness in the Switzerland matter, not an accused.<\/p>\n<p>The mystery of why Sibitane was travelling with Moussa when the diamond dealer was targeted remains to be answered.<\/p>\n<p><strong>O\u2019Sullivan \u2013 corruption buster or gun for hire?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>O\u2019Sullivan \u2013 who has a long career of having worked with the police and is renowned for having exposed corruption within its ranks \u2013 has played an important role in the run up to van Niekerk\u2019s arrest.<\/p>\n<p>On 18 January O\u2019Sullivan called up the former Moti Group employee from London and warned him to come clean on the alleged theft or face the consequences, saying:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou\u2019ll face the music. By the way we know exactly where you\u2019re going and when you\u2019re going\u2026 I didn\u2019t phone you to let you \u2013 a little pipsqueak like you \u2013 interrogate me. Trust me when I tell you, you will face the music for what you\u2019ve done. You can either cooperate with me, and things can be handled that way, or you can put your head in the ground and wait for justice to catch up with you.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Van Niekerk\u2019s lawyer Stephen May has alleged that O\u2019Sullivan\u2019s role is concerning and underscores that there was improper \u201cexternal influence\u201d in the arrest of van Niekerk.<\/p>\n<p>In a letter sent to the senior prosecutor at the Randburg Magistrate\u2019s Court and to SAPS members, May writes: \u201cAt this stage it is noted that O\u2019Sullivan is not a member of the South African Police Service and it is therefore a matter of concern that there is so much reliance upon him in this matter\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>May said O\u2019Sullivan\u2019s call to van Niekerk on 18 January, which was made on the same day the arrest warrant was issued, and the \u201cflagrant disregard\u201d for the order not to move van Niekerk from Durban \u201clead inexorably to the grim conclusion\u201d that van Niekerk\u2019s arrest was \u201cthe product of external influence which was irrational, male fide and had nothing to do with the legitimate prosecution of any prima facie case\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>O\u2019Sullivan\u2019s role is ironic, given that he and Moti were once viciously opposed.<\/p>\n<p>In 2012, O\u2019Sullivan publicly threatened Moti with arrest in connection with an alleged attempt to assassinate Naeem Cassim. Moti and his close friend were said to have been in a dispute with Cassim over money, \u00a0and were accused of having been behind an incident\u00a0 the previous year when Cassim and two friends were forced off the R512 by another vehicle. Cassim told media at the time that they had been trailed by three other vehicles and had been shot at multiple times.<\/p>\n<p>Moti has always maintained his innocence.<\/p>\n<p>Cassim then hired O\u2019Sullivan, who very publicly threatened Moti with prison time and warned him that he would need to \u201cstock up on Vaseline. Twenty years is a very long time, old chap\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>In separate radio interviews in 2012, O\u2019Sullivan and Moti traded accusations. Moti accused O\u2019Sullivan of smearing and harassing him. \u201cHe\u2019s made a list\u201d, Moti told the interviewer, \u201cif I\u2019ve had an argument with you and the dog next door and my neighbour, he goes to see them. So builds a case and then he comes in and says \u2018I want to settle on these bases\u2019. And that\u2019s what he\u2019s doing. He\u2019s extorting me at the moment\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>In O\u2019Sullivan\u2019s interview the following day, he in turn accused Moti of acting in \u201ctypical mafioso\u201d fashion. Speaking about the Cassim case, he was emphatic: \u201cI carried out an investigation and the facts speak for themselves\u201d. Moti, in his unambiguous view, was guilty.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBut I have a contract with the complainant where, if he starts backing off after I\u2019ve exposed all the criminals, I\u2019m entitled to continue with the investigation and charge him anyway \u2013 and I intend to do that. Nobody will buy me off.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>When the case was dropped later that year, O\u2019Sullivan blamed it on a technicality and said \u201cthere is incontrovertible evidence in this matter and I have absolutely no doubt that the trial will proceed and justice will be done\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>The Moti Group told amaBhungane that the case was struck off due to lack of evidence.<\/p>\n<p>In 2013 the National Prosecuting Authority decided not to pursue the matter and the feud between the two men died down.<\/p>\n<p>Thereafter O\u2019Sullivan emerged surprisingly as a Moti supporter.<\/p>\n<p>When Peter Hain, a British peer who campaigned against apartheid and made headlines for speaking out against state capture, entered into a commercial relationship with the Moti Group in Zimbabwe, he told amaBhungane that O\u2019Sullivan, his close friend, had given the Group a clean bill of health.<\/p>\n<p>Now documents seen by amaBhungane suggest that the turn in O\u2019Sullivan\u2019s relationship with Moti may have been cemented by financial interests.<\/p>\n<p>O\u2019Sullivan appears to have warmed to Moti as he started falling out with Cassim over money he said was due for the investigation his firm had done for Cassim.<\/p>\n<p>On 5 February 2015 O\u2019Sullivan obtained a summary judgement from the Gauteng High Court against Cassim, ordering him to pay you R1\u00a0543\u00a0505.07 with interest.<\/p>\n<p>A few months after that, O\u2019Sullivan entered into a loan agreement with Moti \u2013 seemingly the start of a sustained partnership.<\/p>\n<p>The loan agreement, signed on 8 June 2015, would see Moti company Waleed investments loan a total of R1\u00a0681\u00a0542.80 to O\u2019Sullivan \u2013 a figure strikingly similar to what O\u2019Sullivan claims he was owed by Cassim. The debt owed by Cassim would be ceded to Moti\u2019s company.<\/p>\n<p>O\u2019Sullivan denied that the judgement he obtained against Cassim had anything to do with his apparent \u201cswitch\u201d to Moti.<\/p>\n<p>He said that as early as 2014, after he had terminated his agreement with Cassim for non-payment of his fees and begun litigating against him, he entered into a loan agreement with an unrelated company that Moti then acquired a stake in.<\/p>\n<p>He says that around the time he obtained a judgement from Cassim, \u201cthere had been an attempt by people connected to Cassim, to extort an amount of R50m from Moti\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAfter terminating the mandate, in 2013, and discovering the attempted extortion, I washed my hands of Cassim and the alleged crimes committed against him\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>O\u2019Sullivan says that when the state decided not to pursue charges against Moti and it \u201cbecame apparent that Moti had <em>not<\/em> been involved in the alleged murder of Cassim\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>He apologised to the man he had had in his crosshairs not long before \u201cfor unwittingly assisting Cassim to extort him\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>O\u2019Sullivan explains the threats and harsh words he reserved for Moti as a schoolmasterly attempt to ensure things did not get out of hand: \u201cAt that time, there was a lot of tit for tat and I did not want to see things escalate out of hand, so took a hard line\u2026 I wanted to drive the \u2018behave everybody\u2019 message home.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>After his and Moti\u2019s relationship improved, O\u2019Sullivan says that Moti asked him to cede to him the judgment against Cassim \u2013 \u201ca straightforward business transaction, covered by written agreements,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n<p>O\u2019Sullivan has taken issue with the insinuation that he \u201cflipped\u201d to Moti\u2019s side, telling amaBhungane that this \u201cdemonstrates a predisposed intention to colour your intended story\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>He alleged that van Niekerk was \u201cpretending to be a whistle\u2010blower\u2026 [to] cover up the crimes of theft of more than 4,000 documents\u2026 and handing same to your employer\u2019s antagonistic opponent\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>As someone who has himself helped uncover corruption in the police and exposed powerful political figures, O\u2019Sullivan is no stranger to police abuses.<\/p>\n<p>In a submission to the State Capture Commission he described an incident in 2016 when he was pulled off an aircraft just as he was about to depart for the UK with his family.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI was removed form an aeroplane about to depart for London and together with my two minor children forced to disembark in full view of all the passengers in the aeroplane. I was then handcuffed and arrested in the presence of my two minor children, which left my children severely traumatized and me thoroughly humiliated\u2026<\/p>\n<p>\u201c\u2026My arrest and subsequent detention was, with respect, not intended to secure my attendance at a criminal trial, but rather intended to harass and intimidate me and to prevent and punish me from investigating corruption within the police.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>O\u2019Sullivan, however, sees \u201cno parallel at all\u201d between what happened to him, and the case of van Niekerk.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As controversial businessman Zunaid Moti\u2019s sprawling multi-billion rand conglomerate scrambles to contain a leak of sensitive company information, questions have been raised about the role of the South African Police Service (SAPS) and prominent forensic investigator Paul O\u2019Sullivan. Twenty-eight-year-old Clinton&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":25772,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1281,2],"tags":[1174],"class_list":["post-25769","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-motifiles","category-stories","tag-zunaid-moti"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/further.co.za\/amabwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25769","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/further.co.za\/amabwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/further.co.za\/amabwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/further.co.za\/amabwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/further.co.za\/amabwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25769"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/further.co.za\/amabwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25769\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29837,"href":"https:\/\/further.co.za\/amabwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25769\/revisions\/29837"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/further.co.za\/amabwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/25772"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/further.co.za\/amabwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25769"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/further.co.za\/amabwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25769"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/further.co.za\/amabwp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25769"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}